For VPs of Engineering and executive leadership navigating the AI transition

See which AI tools are actually earning their license.

GitClear attributes every line of code to the model that wrote it via Claude, Cursor, Copilot, Codex, Augment or Gemini. Then durable output is scored against rework, defects, review time, and more.

One comprehensive scorecard. Ten minute set up. No sales call required.

No credit card Live scorecard in minutes SOC 2 Type II
G
AI code ROI scorecard — vantara
powered by gitclear · methodology: diff delta + ai attribution
Generated Apr 2026 · Last 90 days
14 contributors · 3 repos
01 AI tool adoption & usage
Co Copilot
62%
Cu Cursor
28%
Cl Claude
19%
·· Other
6%
Weekly AI-assisted commits · 12 wk by developer
Low High
02 ROI signals · last 90 days
41%
AI-attributed lines of all lines committed
22%
Durable change is AI-authored
79%
Devs used AI in past 30 days
3.4 hr
Weekly time saved self-reported avg
▸ Durable output, not volume
Line-level attribution ◂

AI Quality Research Cited By

Heise Online (Robert Lippert) Visual Studio Magazine Augment Code (Molisha Shah) Software Architecture Insights (Lee Atchison) Stack Overflow MIT Technology Review (Edd Gent) Geekwire
The product

Four surfaces. One defensible ROI score.

Every AI stat in GitClear originates from deep analysis of code changes — so when a number doesn't look right, you can always drill into the code that produced it.

01 · Line-level attribution

Every line tagged with the model that wrote it.

GitClear cross-references your Git history with vendor AI usage APIs and agent telemetry hooks to produce commit-grade provenance — no guessing, no aggregate estimates.

  • Claude, Copilot, Cursor, Codex, Augment and Gemini APIs supported out of the box
  • Attribution precision maximized via telemetry hooks
  • Access via a robust API, for your own analysis or internal reporting
src/api/payments/checkout.ts
authored_by_llm · 90d view
42
COPILOT
const result = await validatePayment (req.body);
43
COPILOT
if (!result.ok) return res. status ( 400 ). json (...);
44
HUMAN
// edge case: retry on 503
45
CLAUDE
try { await chargeWithRetry (result.token, 3); }
46
CLAUDE
catch (err) { logger. error (err); throw err; }
47
CURSOR
const audit = await logTransaction (result, req.user);
48
HUMAN
return res. json ({ ok: true , id: audit.id });
28%
Copilot
14%
Cursor
29%
Claude
29%
Human
02 · AI hotspot directories

Find the folders where AI is creating more work than it saves.

Not every directory responds to AI the same way. GitClear surfaces the folders where AI-assisted code has elevated defect and duplication rates — so you can coach, gate, or restrict tool access before it compounds.

  • Per-directory AI %, defect Δ, duplication Δ
  • Risk score normalized against your own baseline
  • Exportable as quarterly engineering review artifact
AI hotspot directories — defect & duplication risk last 90d
Directory AI % Defect Dupl Risk
src/api/payments/ 68% +4.1% 3.2×
lib/auth/oauth/ 54% +2.8% 2.4×
app/models/user/ 47% +1.2% 1.9×
src/components/ui/ 71% +0.3% 1.4×
test/integration/ 82% -0.1% 0.8×
03 · Cohort comparison

See human vs. LLM code, measured by the same yardstick.

GitClear's Diff Delta metric works the same way whether a line came from Claude or a senior staff engineer. Compare durable change velocity, rework rate, and review time across cohorts — without apples-to-oranges caveats.

  • Cohort views by team, repo, or AI tool usage level
  • Side-by-side weekly trends — AI power users vs. non-adopters
  • Statistical significance flags on every delta
Durable change · AI-assisted vs. human-authored 12 wk
AI-assisted
11 devs
Diff Delta / wk +18%
Rework rate (30d) 12%
PRs merged / wk 34
Lead time 1.4d
Human-authored
3 devs
Diff Delta / wk baseline
Rework rate (30d) 9%
PRs merged / wk 28
Lead time 2.2d
Weekly durable change
AI Human
The methodology

Inspired by Google DORA. Built for the AI era.

Three inputs, one defensible number — so finance, your board, and your own engineers can all read the same scorecard without arguing about what it means.

01

Attribution

AI usage APIs plus commit heuristics plus agent telemetry hooks — not survey estimates. Every line traceable to the model that wrote it.

02

Output quality

Diff Delta quantifies durable change vs. churn. Human and LLM code measured with the same metric, across the same time window.

03

Developer experience

Self-reported hours saved and satisfaction scores. Productivity gains don't count if your best engineers are walking.

Industry Leading
AI Code Quality Research

211M
lines of code analyzed across three longitudinal studies. Cited by MIT Tech Review, TechCrunch, and The New Stack.
increase in duplicate code blocks since AI coding assistants became mainstream in enterprise codebases.
higher code churn from AI power users — who also produce 4–10x more code volume.
Integrations

Works with the tools your team already pays for.

GitClear plugs into your Git host and your AI vendor APIs directly — no proxies, no middleware, no code changes. First scorecard renders in under ten minutes.

GitHub GitLab Bitbucket Azure DevOps GitHub Copilot Cursor Claude Code Anthropic API Gemini Code Assist Augment

See what your AI spend is actually returning.

Connect your repos. Get your scorecard in under ten minutes. No credit card, no sales call — unless you want one.